Edmund Morel Institute for Justice and Peace

Saturday, 11 October 2008

Bill Henson and those photos

The Bill Henson controversy has been ignited again by David Marr’s latest book, which defends photo-artist Bill Henson’s right to take naked images of teenage children. My personal view is that it is fundamentally flawed on two counts.
Firstly, to argue that all is allowable in the name of art is to argue that ‘extraordinary rendition’ (ie torture) is permissible if we are able to extract information that we may put to some ‘greater good’. The same fundamentals apply.
The two arguments go like this. They, the enemy, use torture because they are barbarians, but we, we apply 'justifiable' force for the greater good because we are the righteous ones. Similarly pornographers take sexually suggestive photographs of children born of heinous motives but artists may take very similar but award-winning photos that are then hung on gallery walls to great acclaim (usually by other artists).
We would not condone the action of a parent who allowed his or her child to endure significant pain in the name of art. Why are some parents lauded by the arty-farty brigade for allowing their children to take part in an activity clearly on the fringes of normal society’s standards of modesty?
Secondly, Mr Marr is a childless man. It may be that he imagines that he can understand the completely different view a caring parent of a child might have on this subject but, by definition, he does not. He is therefore a member of the group least qualified to comment on the rightness of the actions of Bill Henson and in particular the irresponsible parents of his subjects.

You may like to sign the petition at Bravehearts. Click here

Thursday, 28 August 2008

Using the ASB to effect change

A complaint to the Advertising Standards Bureau is easy and quick.
Click on http://www.adstandards.com.au/pages/complaints.asp and fill out the form. It's mostly ticking boxes. Click 'send' and wait about a month.

At the very least you will cause an advertiser to spend a lot of time, effort and therefore money in defending the ad in question.

If your case is presented well you may have a success like ours below.

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

One for us little guys

Several weeks ago we took exception to a magazine ad for a Mitsubishi Evolution sportscar which included the exhortations- "Hammer the straight" and "Scream through the corners". (See blog below for more detail.)

We felt this was a clear call for owners to drive recklessly.

On behalf of the Institute I lodged a complaint, as did others, with the Advertising Standards Council. Our complaint has been upheld. Mitsubishi Motors has been forced to change the wording on future ads to "Brute force with precision control". Not near so sexy.

Friday, 1 August 2008

Irresponsible Advertising

An advertisement appeared in the SMH supplement Good Weekend on Sat 19 July 2008. It featured a Mitsubishi Evolution sportscar. The blurb below the pic contained the phrases- "Hammer the straight" and " Scream through the corners".

At a time when our young people are being killed needlessly on the roads because of bad driving habits this form of advertising can only be seen as irresponsible.

The Institute has lodged a complaint with the Advertising Standards Bureau and we urge you to do likewise. Go to http://www.adstandards.com.au/pages/complaints.asp

Please note that the only feature of the car being emphasised is the possibility of being able to be drive it as if a race car. Indeed new owners are directly encouraged to treat the road as a racetrack.

This approach to marketing is especially irresponsible at a time when all governments are taking steps to reinforce the road safety message, to young people in particular.

We wouldn’t allow carmakers to claim “drive this car when drunk and have fun” so why are we allowing them to say, in effect, “drive this car at breakneck speed on public roads and have fun”. Both statements are equally irresponsible.

Friday, 4 May 2007

Sorry Day 2007

Last year saw the Illawarra-wide launch of an initiative designed to promote respect for and preserve the memory of, the Stolen Generations of Aboriginal people of Australia.

Illawarra residents were asked to wear a gumleaf on May 26 and, with the assistance of many of the region's schools, ABC Radio and the Illawarra Mercury, many thousands are belived to have done so.

Aboriginal Elders and community representatives attended the officaial launch at St Mary Star of the Sea College. Mr. Colin Markham, a former State Member of Parliament and now Special Ambassador for Reconciliation gave the keynote address.

The event received the support of the National Sorry Day Committee and was attended by committee secretary, Mr. John Bond.
The Institute thanks everyone involved last year for their efforts.

This year we would like to expand the coverage to include all Australia. Please assist in speading the word by emailing a link to this blog to friends, relatives, collegues and media organisations around the country.

Why not bring in some gumleaves on May 26 for work collegues to wear if they wish. Unluckily, this year it's a Saturday so maybe you could do it on the Friday if that suited better.

Who was Edmund Dene Morel?

Edmund Morel exposed the stripping of the Congo Free State (now Democratic Republic of Congo) of its main natural resource, by its European rulers at the end of the 19th century and the terrible suffering the Congolese people had to endure as a result. Edmund Dene Morel was born in Paris in 1873, son of an English mother and French father. He moved to Liverpool at the age of fifteen, where he found employment as a clerk for the Elder-Dempster shipping line. As Morel spoke both English and French he was made liaison officer between the line and officials in Belgium, covering trade with the Congo Free State. The African territory had been controlled by Belgium's ruler King Leopold II since 1870 and was part of his personal assets rather than an imperial territory of Belgium. It was whilst on his many visits to Antwerp from Liverpool to check records that Morel began to realise that a great fraud was being committed, and that even worse things were happening.While rubber was arriving at Antwerp, massive amounts of armaments were being shipped from Antwerp to the Congo, along with other cargo, much of which was of no benefit to the natives of the state itself, but was instead used to prop up the administrative system. Morel questioned how these goods were being paid for when the natives were not allowed to use money and were being sent nothing useful in return for the labour and the resources of their land. So he decided to investigate. The terrible truth, he was to discover, was they were not being paid at all. Leopold had virtually all the natives as slave labour in his lucrative operation, which netted him billions of pounds in today's money, as rubber was one of the most in-demand natural resources at the turn of the last century.Morel took his concerns to the chairman of Elder-Dempster but was offered a bribe to stay quiet so he resigned in 1900 and published a series of articles in 'The Speaker' magazine 'The Congo Scandal' and in the newspaper 'West Africa'. Even here though there were limits to what he could publish so in 1903 he set up his own newspaper - the 'West African Mail' - from his base in Liverpool, detailing the goings on in the Congo. As the news of his actions spread, Morel received letters, reports, documents and photographs from employees of Leopold and many Christian missionaries frustrated with the failure of church leaders to act on their reports. Their leaders were apparently more concerned with 'saving the souls' of the natives than preventing their suffering in this life.Agents of Leopold enslaved Congolese males and ran the Congo as if it was one big gold mine, even creating a mercenary private army. In his publications, Morel detailed how, if men were unwilling to be enslaved, it was policy to send 'sentries' into a settlement, who would loot all animals and items of value, destroy all buildings and capture all women and children. They would then be imprisoned in stockades until the men would work. Many of them returned from these periods of forced labour to find the women had been raped by the soldiers and/or died of malnutrition. Morel also documented how soldiers had to account for the use of each bullet, producing the severed hand of the person it had been used to kill. When they did 'waste' bullets they would frequently cut off the hand of someone living so as to avoid punishment.Slowly Morel won the support of politicians, religious leaders and businessmen, through remarkable skill, hard work and determination. In 1906 alone he sent out 15,000 brochures, wrote 3,500 letters and published 'Red Rubber' - a book detailing all his findings. Though this kind of action is common in these days of 'Make Poverty History', Morel was a true pioneer.In 1908, Leopold was forced to hand over administration of the Congo to the Belgium government, though only after he had taken back substantial assets and received a 'goodwill' gesture of £2,000,000 It would not be until 1913 that the last remnants of Leopold's regime were dismantled. The population of the Congo dropped massively during Leopold's reign and, while not all this can be blamed on him, figures suggest that up to 10 million people died as a result of his policies.Morel became involved in the Liberal Party following his successful campaign, and stood as the candidate for Birkenhead. But by the time of World War I he found himself disagreeing with his party's actions, stating that the situation in Europe had been made worse by the 'secret diplomacy' going on between nations. He set up a group called the Union of Democratic Control (UDC) to fight against this and to argue that post-war peace terms should not humiliate the defeated nation nor should borders be artificially altered for one country's gain.History has proved this to be true, but the 'Daily Express' ran a hate campaign against him and the UDC, denouncing them as 'Pro-German' and encouraging its readers to attack and break up UDC meetings. Morel himself was violently assaulted on several occasions. Police investigated the organisation and found nothing illegal, but in 1917 Morel was jailed for violating the Defence of the Realm Act. On his release Morel joined the Independent Labour Party but was denied high office and in 1924 he died after a heart attack.The legacy in the Congo is sadly like that of many former European colonies. Even after it was freed from the oppressive regime of Leopold it was to continue under the less obvious sufferings of an imperial colony. In 1960 the Congo finally threw their Belgian occupiers out. But the first democratically elected government of Patrice Lumumba was overthrown with the connivance of the US, and Lumumba was assassinated. Today the Congo is still being plundered for its rich resources, by Western corporations. As well as ending the suffering of millions in his time, Morel left perhaps an even greater legacy - the birth of the international human rights movement as we know it today. It is hard to imagine organisations like Amnesty existing without him, and perhaps we should ask why Liverpool still has streets named after slave traders yet there is no tribute to this adopted resident and his work.